Thursday, December 29, 2011

The Patriotic Compass, Part I

Patriotism: devoted love, support, and defense of one's country; national loyalty.

Patriotic: expressing or inspired by patriotism.

Compass: an instrument for determining directions.

Consider for a moment the concept of a moral compass. We've all probably heard of that, right. Anything that might serve to guide someone based on morals, virtues, and values. Often, this term is used with lawyers, judges and decision-makers. Today, I present to you the Patriotic Compass. A concept in loyalty whereby one is guided by love and inspiration for his country.

This compass is often a driving force for those who enlist or commission in the United States Armed Services. There the compass finds its ultimate calling as these men and women voluntarily put their lives in harms way to protect our freedom. In other forms, the compass guides our decision-makers, our police, our firefighters, and other civil servants. However, each and every citizen also has a Patriotic Compass.

Sometimes that compass points to true north and guides the American Citizen toward a better, wholesome, and just nation. These days, however, many, too many, have had their compass damaged and it now points in a misguided direction. This is the first in a series of thoughts and discussion on the direction of our nation and where Barack Obama would like to see it head versus where the true Patriots want it to head back toward.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Iraq - Should have seen this coming

If anyone is surprised that there are terrible attacks and battles being waged between the Muslim sects in Iraq, you should have your head examined, and rethink your political and religious mirror imaging. Fact is, within Islam there is no peace so long as any other belief or system of thought exists. So called Moderate Muslims are even included in that frame of text, especially when you ask a Sunni Muslim about this concept.

The recent bombings in Baghdad do not surprise me. Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims have been at it for a very long time, killing each other, and trying to one-up the other with every new attack. So long as the Americans were present they weren't going to be able to be as overt or successfully achieve large-scale attacks. This includes the Sunni Al-Qa'ida in Iraq. Now that the US has pulled out, based on a flawed timeline not endorsed my military commanders (or at least not for the right reasons). The Iraqis have been capable of defending their country for some time now, but they are not willing to put forth a national loyalty over their religious loyalties. Don't get me wrong here, I too would not forgo my Christian faith over the loyalty of my country, but them I'm not part of an extreme belief system who's holy book pushes, neigh requires, the killing of all those who do not believe as I do.

No, the Iraqis could defend their country, but they have no country unless it falls strictly within the laws of their religion, which Iraq does not do for any of the Muslim sects in existence. What's most saddening, is that Iraq isn't the only place where this happens. Look through history and you will find that the entirety of the Middle East and most of the African continent fall prey to the same dogmatic religious conflict. They cannot be happy until everyone believes as they do. That is a big difference between Islam and Christianity. One most are to PC to call out. Islam cannot live peacefully with other beliefs, even the more loosely held Moderate Muslims. Whereas, Christianity, while having had its issues, battles and wars at times, has largely been able to do so among it's various denominations. I don't mean to make this about religion alone, but I thought this was important to point out.

Many died, and that is very sad. I pray for their families left behind to deal with that loss as well as the many more to come, and for the turmoil they are going to see and experience their country go through. And after all that being said, I close with this...now that we are out of Iraq, let's just stay out. It's a losing battle.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Death of a Dictator

Let me start out that I do not relish in the death of anyone, especially those who pass without Christ as their Savior! We all have probably heard that Kim Jong-Il (KJI), long-time dictator of North Korea, died recently, but many in America have no idea of the implications. They only see the funny little character from the movie Team America.

In fact, KJI was a master manipulator, button-pusher for world angst and anger, and just a plain low down antagonist. With him gone, we don't know what his successor will do. His 20-something son, Kim Jong-Un (KJU) is an unknown to all. He lived a very sheltered life, schooled in Switzerland. There are some indications that he is at best as unstable as his father, and at worst more unstable, especially given his youth. It is unlikely that his reign will lead to a reunification of the peninsula, but rather will lead to a larger black hole that is the Democratic (hear sarcasm) People's Republic of Korea (DPRK).

China has been the only real, close ally of the upper peninsula and with KJU taking over, even they don't know if he'll maintain those ties. Worse yet, the military might not accept his succession given his age and inexperience. Imagine and already fragile and unstable nation being run by a military dictatorship. So what does that mean for America.

Well, if the Leftists like pathetic and forgotten president Jimmy Carter have their way, we'll continue to give food and more supplies to the nation. Problem is, that food doesn't reach the people, and what little might is a very mere fraction of what was intended. No, just like KJI hoarded it all for himself and his cronies, KJU and/or the military will do the same, rest assured. This puts stress on the regions, further stress on our relations with China (not that I'm a fan or support much in foreign relations with China), and it disrupts the economy in the Pacific as it pertains to our export/import trade there.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Where have all the patriots gone?

Republicans this, Democrats that! Congress, to include the failed debt committee, are far too focused on themselves as individuals and parties. Do the parties even provide any value to the government or the system as a whole? How about society? I am really thinking that they do not. They are self-licking ice cream cones, fat wallets, big mouths of hot air, and spoiled brats. All of 'em. They have forgotten what it means to be a patriot.

They have forgotten what real hard work is, and that the majority of Americans are all-too aware. Merriam-Webster defines a patriot as "one who loves his or her country and supports its authority and interests." Let's break this down.

The first part is very straight forward and I would not dare question whether any of those in Congress love their country, assuming that their country really is the United States of America. I think you can love a country, or at least your selective parts of it, and not really be a patriot. That second half though, I think that part is where you see a stark difference; and it's here that I'll try not to get long-winded.

If a patriot is one who "supports...[[his country's]] authority..." then he must support the supreme law of the land. And what is that law? It is the Constitution of the United States of America! The vast majority of our Congress grew up with that knowledge. School teaching further deepened it. And yet, they are the ones making the laws that slowly, quietly, almost secretly destroy our supreme law! And those at the State level are just as guilty. They implement changes to education that have far reaching effects by distorting our children's views of freedom, capitalism, and the American dream (side note: the present version of the American dream is no longer the pure desire for liberty and justice that it once was).

As for supporting the country's interests, we are talking of our domestic interests in the way of education (most polls/estimates put the US at the middle of the road), economics (think debt super committee - failure), border security (well, that is for another time), etc. Now think about it, are we any better off in any of those areas? Have they improved over the last decade? Two? Three decades? That would be a resounding, NO! This would also include supporting America's foreign interests, too. Let's see, they want early withdraw from Iraq, Afghanistan, and pretty much anywhere the liberals cry we "invaded." They are pushing jobs, our jobs, off to foreign lands (and then asking why the unemployment rate is high). Oh my, I know I could go on, but I think we'll dive into each topic one at a time in the future.

In fact, feel free to let me know what you would most be interested in hearing about. I pray that you all have a Happy Thanksgiving!

Thursday, November 17, 2011

A Facebook Chat

I was compelled to write on the Facebook page of the "occupiers" the other day, and received an interesting response. I was inspired in a way to respond in a manner that I hope helps others to grasp what is really going on. Here is the short discussion thus far. I'll post more depending on how long that goes.


My Original Post: Can you even identify any solution to the "problem" you believe exists? And by the way, I'm part of the 99%, but you DO NOT REPRESENT ME or FREEDOM for that matter! You represent spoiled rotten little brats hell bent on socialism!

Jorge: solution is abolishing money, why do we have to pay for everything?, caitalist system is unfare, maybe you have not being reached, but poverty is close to your window, open your eyes, capitalism request more profits everyday, it never gonna end, fields dead, no more fish on the sea. natural resources are not infinite. we need to restore everything, but occupy ignore this idea, they seem hippies, homeless, help them to focus about we really care. have a nice day patrick. by the way, sorry for mi english, i am learning the languaje in order to write them my ideas, but this page is like the world, each individual has a path and never see each other.

Me: Jorge, your English was just fine. However, you call capitalism unfair and I call Socialism unfair. One may define Communism as unfair. In practice, nearly every system you can imagine is unfair. First, they are unfair because people are people. We are greedy, over ambitious, and love power. That alone is enough to corrupt any system. Second, one must grow up and accept that life isn't fair. Again, due to the nature of human beings. We abuse the God-given gift of free choice to screw over our fellow man. As for poisoning the Earth, not much argument there from me, except to say that the Earth, just like people, began to die the day it was born.
You are absolutely on the spot too, that the occupiers ignore reality. They want what truly can never be achieved. They are hippies as far as they dream of what cannot be; homeless, because they choose to sit in a park with no plumbing, not showering, and hurting the small business rather than their original target on Wall Street as they deny customers' access to the local "little man"

Sunday, November 13, 2011

The Real Grand Old Party - AMERICA

I am a firm believer that one should vote for the candidate that truly holds this nation's values at heart. It ought not be a battle over political party biases or who can beat the current president (though I look forward to Barry being a one-term wonder)! No, my fellow Americans, this must be about voting for the candidate that has the track record to vote and push in the direction you wish to see this nation go. So many out there want you to vote conservative, or liberal, or not at all, or whatever. I say they are wrong. I say you should educate yourself on each and every candidate before choosing. You should put aside your dislike for this president and vote for the best new president. Belong to no one party, except for that one truly grand old party called America!